02.26.10

Lloyd Pye – Human Genetics

Human DNA reveals evidence for Intervention. Lloyd Pye discusses the smoking gun inside human DNA- humans could not have evolved by mutation and natural selection. 2009.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • MisterWong
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Google Bookmarks

25 Responses to “Lloyd Pye – Human Genetics”

  1. i think your “god” is actually aliens that created humans

  2. Candygirl and Badwolf: PLEASE take your pissing contest away from this forum. This is not the place for it. Thanks!

  3. this is science fiction

  4. zulu: That’s easy to say when you don’t know poop about it.

  5. awesome, Ive thought something along those lines for a long time

  6. touche. i do have an anthropology degree though, i at least know when to when to raise flags

  7. ryan: It’s a much broader field than just this. Plenty of room to explore and become informed.

  8. Dear Lloyd
    When scientist achieved to embarace old women, I suddenly thought: that is the meaning of the many virgins bearing babies in the past. Studying anthropology I noticed a sudden skull transformation concerning our race. Previous evolution took long selection time, while humans S.Sapiens appeared with no step between neandertha or Erectus and us. Genesis YHWH is complaining because of the bad human actituds after creation!!. We are poor being without cosmic envolvement. Claudia

  9. Claudia: I agree that there is no time for, or evidence of, a transformation between Neanderthal or Homo Erectus and Cro-Magnons (humans). We suddenly appear with, as you say, no sign of evolving.

  10. I think this is true. Plus several encouters of the third kind involve giant beings as in the Flatwoods monster case, in 1952, which makes it all the more uncanny because the “gods “of antiquity were also supposed to be much taller than humans.

  11. ripper: Ironically, the Starchild case will be combined with the Flatwoods Monster case in the upcoming segment on “MonsterQuest” scheduled to first air in February, probably late in the month.

  12. Well, that only means we are making progress toward a better understanding of our origins. Anyway, thank you for all your explanations about this complex issue.

  13. Lloyd: This video is very well done and the narration provides a fantastic explanation giving a basic common-sense argument against the mainstream consensus opinions.

    It’s all just speculation and my BullSh** meter never stops going off, but the info in this video instantly strikes me as accurate. You are the man for putting all this together.

    The slides on your website and your EverythingIsWrong video are jam packed full of fascinating material, and you are a great public speaker too.

  14. it makes perfect sense.
    Raptors evolved into birds , and you dont see raptors to this day , so if we evolved from monkeys why are there still monkeys everywhere we dont just half evolve! ..

  15. Real: Thanks so very much for this high praise of my work. I’m always glad to hear about when someone “gets” it…..

  16. Jay: You’re right in saying things don’t just half evolve….not possible.

  17. 3:28 major MAJOR error, we did NOT evolve from chimps/other primates we evolved separately, do we have common ancestors? yes, but we are perfectly evolved humans and they are perfectly evolved apes and there is no evidence that we evolved from them or that they would ever evolve into us.

    Very big and sadly common error by people who don’t understand evolution.

  18. DSBrekus: I’m very well aware of how it is supposed to have worked, but in a brief format like this there isn’t time to go into the details that seem to satisfy people like you. Yes, we SUPPOSEDLY evolve from a common ancestor, but whatever that was, it was a helluva lot more like a chimp than a human. Do you know anything about Miocene apes?

  19. I’m not asking for you to go into too much detail, I’m asking you to not intentionally deceive people. I don’t think that is unreasonable.

    I can’t understand the narcissism of people like you who think the human race is some magical species that must be oh so special or else? what? admitting we are just another end on the evolutionary chain is somehow so intolerable?

    I don’t appreciate people who should be informed enough to know better exploiting peoples lack of knowledge to their own ends.

  20. DSBrekus: I’d be happy to admit humans were just another link (surely not an “end,” as you suggest) in an evolutionary chain, if there were defendable evidence that is the case. In fact (a fact you can’t possibly be aware of), an overwhelming bulk of hard, clear, scientific evidence suggests we are the result of genetic manipulation, starting with our fused 2nd and 3rd chromosomes that distinguish us from all other higher primates. Much more such evidence is available, of course.

  21. If it was the case that there was “an overwhelming bulk of hard,clear,scientific evidence”

    Then it would not be the case that it would be “a fact you can’t possibly be aware of”

    Would it?

    Your arguments, much like the ones for ID are based on your unsupported intuition, it doesn’t matter how many people you scam into believing you, it will never make your speculations facts.

  22. DSBrekus: Look, there are Creationist wackos, Intelligent Design wackos, and Darwinist wackos. You’re the latter, but I’m none of the above, I’m an Intervention wacko. We all have our points of view and we all know how to defend them and how to attack the others.

    Why don’t we just leave it at this: You believe what you choose to believe and I’ll believe what I choose to believe, and I won’t inflict mine on you if you’ll go away and stop trying to inflict yours on me. Okay? Fair enough?

  23. Woops sorry accidentally posted comment before it was done, here we go again.

    You see the issue is that through these videos and commentary you are ‘inflicting’ your views on others, if you had kept it to yourself I would neither know nor care about it.

    We all have our beliefs and our biases but the question is whose biases are illegitimate?

    I think the fact that you knowingly omit or alter facts to suite your arguments is a sign of illegitimate bias, In any case I’ve said all I came to.

  24. western evolution theory is a lie. they need 2 have an answer 4 everything so we’ll listen to their lies. there’s much more, and a deeper, longer origin 4 humans.

  25. @DSBrekus yeah, like many scientists and religions.

Leave a Reply